Operations and Challenges of Small Claims Courts in Kenya

The Small Claims Courts (SCCs) in Kenya were established under the Small Claims Court Act of 2016, as a subordinate court in the structure of the court system in Kenya under Article 169 (1) (d) of the Constitution. Its primary goal is enhancing access to justice for civil and commercial disputes involving claims up to Ksh 1 million. Their main objective is to guarantee the right of access to justice as envisioned under Article 48 of the Constitution through simplicity procedure, timely disposal of proceedings, fairness of processes and reasonable court fees. They are intended to reduce the backlog of cases by having disputes settled through simple, inexpensive and expeditious procedures, while enhancing the ease of doing business in the country. The inception of these courts has indeed revolutionized the resolution of disputes, offering a swift and accessible venue for justice.

Scope of Operations

These courts operate under a framework designed to simplify legal processes. Key features include:

1. Jurisdiction: The SCCs handle civil claims related to contracts for the sale and supply of goods or services, tort claims for property damage, and personal injury compensation, among others. Section 12 of the Act specifies that the Court has jurisdiction to determine any civil claims whose value does not exceed Kenya Shillings One million, KES 1,000,000. However, they explicitly exclude cases related to defamation, land disputes, and employment matters, under Section 13
2. Procedural Simplicity: The court procedures are less formal than those in higher courts. It is presided over by an adjudicator who is an advocate of the High Court of Kenya with at least three years’ experience in the legal field. Further, Section 32 of the Act asserts that the strict evidentiary rules are also relaxed. The court may admit as evidence any oral or written testimony, record, or other material even though the same is not admissible as evidence in any other Court under the law of evidence allowing for a broader range of evidence to be admitted. This is intended to facilitate quicker resolutions and reduce the intimidation often felt by laypersons in legal settings.
3. Timeliness: The SCCs are mandated to resolve cases within 60 days of filing, a significant improvement over traditional courts, which often face backlogs. Section 34 of the Act provides that all proceedings before the Court on any particular day so far as is practicable shall be heard and determined on the same day or on a day basis until final determination of the matter. This expedited process is crucial for claimants who need timely resolutions to their disputes. Further, Section 38 of the Act provides that a person aggrieved by the decision or an order of the Court may appeal against that decision or order to the High Court on matters of law,
4. Accessibility: The SCCs have been rolled out in various counties across Kenya, including Nairobi, Mombasa, and Kisumu, making them more accessible to the public. The establishment of these courts is part of a broader initiative to improve the ease of doing business in Kenya, particularly for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that rely on swift legal recourse.

Challenges Faced by Small Claims Courts

Despite their successes, the Small Claims Courts face a number of challenges. These include:

1. Limited Public Awareness: Many potential users are still unaware of the existence, functions and the scope of operations of the Small Claims Courts. There is need for increased public education and outreach to ensure that individuals know they can seek justice through these courts without the usual burdens associated with traditional legal proceedings.
2. Resource Limitations: The operational efficiency of the Small Claims Courts are hampered by limited resources, including inadequate staffing and facilities. As the demand for these courts grows, ensuring that they are well-equipped to handle the influx of cases is essential for maintaining their effectiveness.
3. Quality of Legal Representation: While these allow for less formal representation, many claimants may still lack adequate legal knowledge or representation. This can lead to imbalances in the courtroom, where more knowledgeable parties may exploit the system at the expense of less informed claimants.
4. Appeals Process: While the Small Claims Courts aim for quick resolutions, the appeals process can still pose a great challenge. Decisions made by the Small Claims Courts can be appealed to the High Court, which may prolong the resolution of disputes and negate the speed that the Small Claims Courts are designed to provide.

Conclusion

The Small Claims Courts in Kenya represent a significant step towards improving access to justice for ordinary citizens and small businesses. By simplifying procedures and expediting case resolutions thus alleviating backlogs, they reinforce the essential right to access justice as outlined in Article 48 of the Constitution. However, to fully realize their potential, ongoing efforts are needed to raise public awareness, enhance resource allocation, and ensure equitable access to legal representation. As these courts continue to evolve, they hold the promise of transforming the landscape of civil justice in Kenya.

The opinion expressed here in is purely that of the author. For further inquiries please contact our office on 0742028500